Thoughts About Hell
Dec. 18th, 2011 09:47 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
worldofluckyEarlier today I posted this to my facebook/google+ accounts. I just was thinking today bout religion and about people burning in hell (I had just read an article of a preacher praising the fact that Christopher Hitchens was burning in hell). So I came up with the following.
Is it fair to cast someone out for eternity for the mistakes of a single lifetime, even a long lifetime? Does 80 years of sinning really deserve eternity of torment? Even the most vile person doesn't deserve to burn in hell for billions of years.
It seems as the eons stretch out, that a truly just God would give an option to be let out for good behavior, but then that is saying that god is just and benevolent. If he isn't, he would keep someone suffering forever.
Take a long life of 80 years and divide it by 14 billion years (the current believed age of this universe), A person only lives 0.00000000571429 of the time the universe existed. To convert that to percentages its still only 0.000000571429% lifespan of the universe.
Now that number is hard to understand so let me break it down into something we can understand in lay terms. If a person lives 80 years. That percentage represents roughly 14.4 seconds. That means if the lifespan of the universe is 80 years, we are judged on what we do for 14.4 seconds.
That doesn't seem fair or just. Perhaps this means if God is fair and just that there is reincarnation and we get more than one chance. If he doesn't give you more than one, and he really exists, then he isn't as benevolent as you think.
edit:
I had a friend asked me if I felt this way now that it has come out that Kim Jong Il is gone and how I felt about that. I figured I would put my response here as well:
I do. I honestly think this goes for Hitler as well. Hitler was evil, but people are shaped by their birth issues, life experiences, by mental illness and by disease (syphilis in Hitler's case). A mentally healthy person doesn't do those acts.
Even Hitler, Pol Pot, Dahmer or Gacy don't deserve an eternity. If the whole heaven or hell thing is true, either they should only be punished after a certain amount of time (say a thousand years for every life they took - that number is of course arbitrary) or they should be judged over the course of several life times.
If someone makes the same mistakes (or similar ones) over the course of time then maybe they do deserve it. After all God supposedly will come and judge the living and the dead. That means according to Christian theology no one is in hell yet as judgment happens at the same time for everyone. I could be more understanding if people were reborn constantly until that time and they were judged overall.
Then again I never fit in with Catholic theology well, always felt there might be reincarnation.
That was just my response. I wonder if I should have done this as a video blog.
Is it fair to cast someone out for eternity for the mistakes of a single lifetime, even a long lifetime? Does 80 years of sinning really deserve eternity of torment? Even the most vile person doesn't deserve to burn in hell for billions of years.
It seems as the eons stretch out, that a truly just God would give an option to be let out for good behavior, but then that is saying that god is just and benevolent. If he isn't, he would keep someone suffering forever.
Take a long life of 80 years and divide it by 14 billion years (the current believed age of this universe), A person only lives 0.00000000571429 of the time the universe existed. To convert that to percentages its still only 0.000000571429% lifespan of the universe.
Now that number is hard to understand so let me break it down into something we can understand in lay terms. If a person lives 80 years. That percentage represents roughly 14.4 seconds. That means if the lifespan of the universe is 80 years, we are judged on what we do for 14.4 seconds.
That doesn't seem fair or just. Perhaps this means if God is fair and just that there is reincarnation and we get more than one chance. If he doesn't give you more than one, and he really exists, then he isn't as benevolent as you think.
edit:
I had a friend asked me if I felt this way now that it has come out that Kim Jong Il is gone and how I felt about that. I figured I would put my response here as well:
I do. I honestly think this goes for Hitler as well. Hitler was evil, but people are shaped by their birth issues, life experiences, by mental illness and by disease (syphilis in Hitler's case). A mentally healthy person doesn't do those acts.
Even Hitler, Pol Pot, Dahmer or Gacy don't deserve an eternity. If the whole heaven or hell thing is true, either they should only be punished after a certain amount of time (say a thousand years for every life they took - that number is of course arbitrary) or they should be judged over the course of several life times.
If someone makes the same mistakes (or similar ones) over the course of time then maybe they do deserve it. After all God supposedly will come and judge the living and the dead. That means according to Christian theology no one is in hell yet as judgment happens at the same time for everyone. I could be more understanding if people were reborn constantly until that time and they were judged overall.
Then again I never fit in with Catholic theology well, always felt there might be reincarnation.
That was just my response. I wonder if I should have done this as a video blog.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2011-12-24 03:12 am (UTC)With all of this, how does brain damage come into play. A simple small stroke, a hit on the head, a bad drug OD can all result in your brain shifting. It will result in a full personality shift. I have seen it (and the wife has seen it way more than me) that someone who was loving and sweet took either a head injury or had a minor stroke and it changed them 180 degrees. They became nasty, mean, abusive and rude. Because of an accident out of their control are they really going to be destined for hell? What about sociopaths, mental illness, etc. We may have a "choice" about things, but there are lots of people that don't have choices. A true psychotic break can't be prayed away, and if you are suffering from a psychotic break you won't even know to pray. Depression, bi-polar, etc are all things that strike and are actual brain chemistry issues.
This of course doesn't even include the different starting positions people start with, ranging from wealthy and easy life down to living on the streets, or all the way to living in a war torn country where you have to kill to survive. If we are being allowed to choose, why are some people giving a better shot and some a worse shot, either from mental health, injury or just where they are born?
If we are all judged on one life, why does god situate some in better position then others. Of course this would be a moot point if there was reincarnation/rebirth and you got judged overall. Then it wouldn't matter because you would probably start in multiple areas. But judged on a single set of years seems cruel to make it unfair.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-27 02:07 pm (UTC)First thing I have to point out is that money, position, and power do not make you happy. I have had considerably more of all of those things than I do now and was not happy. When I was little and homeless; we weren't always eating well, but we were generally happy. Especially when we were homeless, little things made for real excitement. A bag of potatoes and a couple of packs of Ramen could truly make my day back then. We didn't start having real problems until my parents got good paying jobs and could afford drugs...
Starting or ending position is irrelevant to God's plan for a life or for even being happy (no matter what you believe in – or not -). What you do with what you've got makes all the difference.
Second, “doing good” is also irrelevant in some respects. It is a one-way street. Salvation will encourage good works and “produce fruit of the spirit” but the reverse is not true. Works will not justify salvation. Salvation is a gift. (Incidentally, this one-way street anology resolves the Paul-v-Peter theological arguments many theologians like to harp on too much). I believe in ‘deathbed confessions’ if they are true/heartfelt conversions. However, counting on them is a bit too close to gambling. The few times I have been closest to death: I either hurt too much to think, medication numbed me senseless, I concentrated sincerely & solely on that next breath, or thought, “Really? This is it, huh?” (not exactly proud of that last one, would love to say I had a deep or even a religious thought, but instead that’s what went through my mind right before impact).
Finally. As for brain damage, God does not judge those in a state of innocence. Children are an example of this. While it is not strictly biblical, I believe that mental illness falls into this category. In this way, the cognoscente person is the one who’s life will be evaluated… the damaged individual will not. The individual who was faithful to God all their life and then suffers a stroke which damages them, will not be judged on the part they have no control over. This is also why the question of choice or “made that way” becomes an issue with regards to sexuality. It the individual was damaged (pregnancy error exposed them to too much of a specific hormone, genetic mutation, etc), then many in the religious community would have a difficult time with condemning all sexual distinctives. However, if it is purely a choice; then you have a bit of a rub… explaining the quibbling in the church, culture, and media over the details. Some things are just not so easy to sort out and in many of these difficult questions… the “devil is in the details”.